翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Shi
・ United States v. Shipp
・ United States v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians
・ United States v. Shynkarenko
・ United States v. Simms
・ United States v. Singer Mfg. Co.
・ United States v. Johns
・ United States v. Johnson
・ United States v. Johnson (1863)
・ United States v. Johnson (1899)
・ United States v. Johnson (1911)
・ United States v. Johnson (1944)
・ United States v. Johnson (1946)
・ United States v. Johnson (1966)
・ United States v. Johnson (1968)
United States v. Johnson (1982)
・ United States v. Johnson (1987)
・ United States v. Johnson (2000)
・ United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 302 (1943)
・ United States v. Jones (2012)
・ United States v. Jones (disambiguation)
・ United States v. Jordan
・ United States v. Ju Toy
・ United States v. Juvenile Male
・ United States v. Kagama
・ United States v. Kahriger
・ United States v. Kaiser
・ United States v. Karo
・ United States v. Kebodeaux
・ United States v. Keenan


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Johnson (1982) : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Johnson (1982)

''United States v. Johnson'', , was a United States Supreme Court case.
== Background ==
United States Secret Service agents arrested a suspect at his home without an arrest warrant. Before trial, the defendant sought to suppress his oral and written statements as fruits of an unlawful arrest not supported by probable cause. The United States District Court found the arrest to be proper and admitted the evidence, and a jury then convicted the defendant of a federal crime. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of conviction.
While the defendant's petition for rehearing was pending before the Court of Appeals, the United States Supreme Court decided Payton v. New York, , in which it was held that the Fourth Amendment prohibits the police from making a warrantless and nonconsensual entry into a suspect's home to make a routine felony arrest. The Court of Appeals granted the defendant's petition for rehearing, withdrew its prior opinion, and on the strength of Payton v. New York reversed the judgment of conviction. The government petitioned for rehearing, arguing that the principles of Payton should not apply retroactively to an arrest that had occurred before Payton was decided. The Court of Appeals disagreed, denied the petition for rehearing, and amended its opinion to clarify that Payton did apply retroactively.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Johnson (1982)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.